Brian-Green-Lecture-Radcliffe-2017

  • Introduction
    • Nod to Drew Faust on her retirement at end of academic year
    • Brian is on board of overseers
  • April 1955, Albert Einstein on his death bed hospital bed at Princeton Hospital
    • Pad of paper w/ equations
    • Continuing to work quest for over 30 years on “unified theory” stitching together forces of nature into 1 explanatory equation
  • 1 key question re: search to understand deep fundamental forces of nature
    • How did the universe begin?
    • We have theories
      • Big Bang
    • We can take mathematics and wind the universe in reverse to a fraction of a second after beginning
    • To go further back in time (to true time 0), the math breaks down
  • Can we find a math formula to even explain conditions at time 0 or earlier?
  • These questions go back to at least Isaac Newton
    • During black death, he retreated to his family’s country home, did a huge amount of work on theory, observation, math, etc.
      • Universal law of gravity came from this period
        • Gravitational force defined by how big objects are and their distance from each other
        • His math mostly works for celestial objects “breathtaking” predictive power
        • He also found something “embarassing” his math could describe the force of gravity but couldn’t say how gravity actually works! What is the mechanism?
        • I leave the question to the reader
  • Albert Einstein wants to figure out how gravity actually works
    • 10 long years on this
    • The rubber sheet analogy w/ the bowling ball causing deformations and other balls movement being affected by the deformation
    • He gave us both the analogy and the actual equations to describe
    • Observational data, over time, proved that Einstein’s equations were confirmed his theory of general relativity
  • Gravitational ripples in fabric of space created by two dense objects rotating around one another in space
    • Harder to test/observe than other dynamic systems
  • Several decades of work
    • Einstein never thought the gravitational waves would ever be detected
    • Kip Thorne and others posited an experiment
  • Sept 14 2015 2 different gravity wave detectors (LIGO’s) independently confirmed gravitational ripples generated by collision of 2 black holes 1.3 billion light years away (1.3 billion years ago)
    • LIGO Hanford
    • LIGO Livingston
    • This experiment first turned on 2 light days in advance of the wave actually hitting earth
  • Quantum Mechanics
    • Theories first emerged during Einstein’s lifetime. He didn’t really like it
    • Particle-wave duality
    • Quantum tunneling
      • On sub-atomic layer, electrons DO occasionally pass thru impermeable walls
  • Problem there’s a feature of Quantum Mechanics that conflicts w/ General Theory of Relativity
    • Uncertainty Principle we cannot, with precision, predict with certainty both the position and velocity of an object at the same time
    • Uncertainty reigns in the microscopic world
    • This uncertainty also applies to the fabric of space-time and, therefore, disrupts Relativity
    • Einstein’s geometry works at macroscopic layer but not at the frothy_uncertain_undulating conditions at the smallest scale of reality
  • Intro to String Theory
  • Note that String Theory does not yet have experimental verification of its theory the way that relativity and QM have enjoyed
  • Question — what is the smallest constituent element of reality?
    • Greeks defined It as atom
    • But we know that atoms can be split into
      • Electrons, protons, neutrons
      • Some of those particles can be broken up into even smaller elements like quarks
  • String Theory hypothesizes that smallest element of nature is a string or loop or filament that oscillates or vibrates and the different types of vibration are what creates different kinds of sub-atomic particles
  • Mid 1980’s when mathematics behind string theory first emerged
  • The math also suggested a unification of QM and relativity
  • But String Theory also suggests that the universe may also contain additional dimensions beyond the traditional 3
  • Question — standard model has a bunch of standard number re: mass and other characteristics (size ,charge, etc.) of various particples in the atomic zoo
    • But why these numbers?
    • Even small differences in these numbers could create huge changes in nature of universe
    • 20 numbers each describe different ways that the strings can vibrate
  • Strings also vibrate in the curled up additional dimensions
    • If we knew exactly what the extra dimensions look like, we could finish the vibration calculations of the string and, thus, be able to derive the WHY of each standard model number
  • Hints of a multiverse where other universes are built on different standard model numbers?
  • The theoretical work continues. Many questions unanswered but worth pursuing