Skip to main content US-Paris-Agreement-8-Mar-2021
US and the Paris Agreement 8 Mar 2021
- Speakers
- Robert Stavins, Professor HKS
- Tina Latif (one of the lead negotiator of Paris Agreement)
- Natalie Untertell (Brazilian negotoiator) Stavin
- What will happen w/ US Climate Policy under Biden Administration
- rejoined Paris Agreement (started process on 1/20, formerly a party again on 2/19)
- Hard part — Nationally determined contribution (NDC) — how much greenhouse gas will be reduced by 2030
- Challenging because
- must be ambitious enough to satisfy domestic green group and key countries
- Will need to be more ambitious than Obama NDC (26-28% below 2005 by 2025 and 50% by 2030)
- Must be credible — achievable w/ reasonably anticipated policy actions)
- Only way both conditions are met w/ new legislation
- But senate require 60 votes
- budget reconciliation procure might be used for 51
- So, prospects for comprehensiveive climate legislation not very good
- Non-climate legislation could reduce GHG long-term
- Post-CoViD economic stimulus could have some green elements
- Infrastructure bill w/ electricity grid updates (for greater reliance on renewable sources and greater penetration of EV)
- Tax incentives (subsidies) — wind and solar, carbon capture and storage, nuclear power, tech initiatives, EV rebates, etc.
- these are feasible, but probably not enough
- Will need to also layer on regulatory actions
- Regulatory Orders
- EO’s
- reinstate and surpass Obama CAFE standards for vehicles
- Reinstate Obama rule re methane leaking from wells and pipelines
- Recalculate social cost of carbon
- Agency actions
- SEC — disclosure requirements for climate risk
- Commodity futures trading commission — market risk
- Congressional review act to nullify rule but
- must be w/in 60 legislative days of rule’s original adoption
- Congress must authorize any new reg of substantially same form
- Challenges to regulation
- new rules have lengthy notice and comment period
- Subject to litigation
- More likely to challenged successfully than during Obama years
- 245 trump appointed federal judges
- Supreme Court 6-3 conservative majority
- Favors literary readings of statutes, less flexible
- May modify/overrule Chevron Doctrine (under which federal courts defeat to angencies when Congress was not explicit)
- One striking example — question of whether CO2 may be regulated under parts of Clean Air Act — intended for localized air pollution
- Other possibilities
- “whole of government” approach to climate change
- All departments and agencies consider climate impact of all police and actions
- Will this really produce in terms of short-term emissions and long-term decarbonizing of economy?
- State-level policies can be effective
- sub-national — California and Northest becoming more important
- Bottom-up national policy evolving from Democratic-leaning states
- Which represent more than half of US population and an even greater share of economic activity and GHG emissions
- best scientists, lawyers, and economists to design sound climate policies that also be politically feasible
- Links
- belfer center on climate
- Harvard environmental economic program
- Stavin’s personal website ## Latif##
- Optimistic about reframing the conversation
- Positive case for action — call for structural change to global economy
- We expect Biden to make a Net Zero commitment in April at a climate conference
- New wave of investment and innovation
- What might “winning” look like?
- Need to make Paris Agreement relevant and talked about at all levels of government
- Optimistic about “whole of government” approach
- decision-makers across multiple sectors providing currently untold value
- Nudge governments to scan horizon on where they will be in 20 years
- ideas for incentives for businesses, governments
- Need to mainstream climate thinking
- International Women’s Day
- disproportionate impact of climate change on women in developing countries and disaster situation
- 14x more likely to die in a natural disaster
- Girls 2-3x more likely to not get back to school post-disaster
- Can be a path to a more prosperous future Untertell
- Paris Agreement is having real effect on real economy
- Major trade deal between EU and Mercosur
- currently blocked about potential risks to Paris Agreement
- But actively being negotiated
- Climate diplomacy has not yet caught up
- Most of the top 18 major emitters and signers have not updated major emitter goals
- US re-joining Paris and multi-literalism is welcome and very important
- biggest historical contributor
- Still 20% of current emissions
- hopefully, Biden admin can be more generous to international green funds
- More trust in multi-lateralism
- Powerful political leverage to push other countries in the right direction
- Trump’s announcement in 2017 de-stabilized trust in US commitments but also encouraged other countries to decrease their contributions
- Biden re-joining is having a positive domino effect
- China and US both need to increase their NDC’s
- Hopeful about India
- Brazil currently moving in the wrong direction (esp. deforestation)
- lots of expectations in bi-lateral and regional contributions by US